On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:29:25PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > (ii) You make a very good argument that policy should continue to give > guidance for this kind of situation. The target should probably be > put back in policy, but with an explicit note saying it's not normally > desirable, or something. That would require deciding what should the target do first. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature