[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Systemd user instance equivalent of dh_systemd_enable?



On 08/04/2018 05:28, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 at 18:18:11 -0600, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> I'm working on a package that installs a systemd user instance unit file
>> that needs to be enabled with
>>
>> # systemctl --global enable foo.service
> 
> I believe the only way to do this is currently to make
> it be statically enabled for all users (ship a symlink in
> /usr/lib/systemd/user/${something}.wants).
> 
> What is the package?
> 
> Is it something that all users are going to want?>
> Is it something that makes sense to run every time any user logs in in
> any way (ssh, console login, graphical login) or only on entry to a
> graphical session?
> 
> Would it make sense to arrange for it to be socket-activated (like
> dbus-user-session, gpg-agent, pulseaudio) or D-Bus-activated (like
> gnome-terminal-server) or autostarted on login to a graphical session (via
> /etc/xdg/autostart), rather than being started eagerly on every login?
> 
> (The way packages like dbus-user-session, gpg-agent and pulseaudio set
> themselves up for socket activation is to have their *.socket unit be
> statically enabled in sockets.target, but not their *.service unit in
> default.target.)

Hi Simon,

the package is dbus-broker, a replacement for dbus-deamon. You may have
heard of it: there has been a short exchange about its packaging for
Debian with its developers with the Debian dbus maintainers in Cc.

dbus-broker ships an user instance unit file with this Install section:

[Install]
Alias=dbus.service

with

# systemctl --global enable foo.service

a /etc/systemd/user/dbus.service symlink is created that overrides the
unit installed by dbus-daemon obtaining that dbus-broker "takes over"
the bus activation units installed by dbus-daemon. A similar thing is
done for the system bus, but that is taken care of by dh_systemd_enable
just fine.

I can create the link manually.

Cheers,
Dan


Reply to: