Re: Extended Long Term Support for Wheezy
On 14954 March 1977, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> - for ftpmasters, can we keep wheezy/updates on security.debian.org for
> one year more? (it might be possible to archive wheezy and drop it from
> the main mirror, that would be a clear sign to everybody that something
> important changed, and we could reconfigure the buildd to use another
> - are there other problems related to this extended LTS that need to be
If this would be "just" extending the current LTS ways for more time,
then it would be OKish to stay on donated, voluntarily managed,
infrastructure. After all it helps all users of wheezy with updates,
nominally over all of wheezy.
But the proposal is effectively just for a benefit of a few paying
customers, with a very selected set of packages and architectures, all
the rest lost out. Thats not ok to ask volunteers to support, nor
is it ok to use projects infrastructure for. The companies that want it,
should run it.