[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#886238: closed by Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> (Re: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile)



On Sun, 07 Jan 2018, Hleb Valoshka <375gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/5/18, Debian Bug Tracking System <owner@bugs.debian.org> wrote:
>> From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
> ...
>> As you have been already told by several people, Debian supports
>> systemd-less systems.  If you find bugs running in this mode, please
>> file bug reports.
>
> I've already posted a bug number which perfectly shows how bugs for
> systemd-less systems are treated.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850069
>
>> Control: severity -1 wishlist
>
> W_I_S_H_L_I_S_T_!
>
> System is broken,

Wrong.

Which bit of this reply is not clear to you?

  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857322#10

Did you perhaps miss the fact that the two bugs had been merged?

Without the merged bug, there is no patch, so in that case you would
have nothing to complain about (maintainers are _NOT_ required to fix
such bugs, but should not reject patches without good reason).

With the merged bug, we have a patch that is described as "prelimiary"
and suggests a way of testing it. :

  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857322#25

Therefore it needs testing before one could legitimately complain about
the maintainer blocking it.

Have you contributed to that testing?

If so, why is that not visible in the bug?

If not, how about putting your efforts into something useful (testing),
rather than wasting your and our time with this intemperate drivel?

Cheers, Phil.
-- 
|)|  Philip Hands  [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]  HANDS.COM Ltd.
|-|  http://www.hands.com/    http://ftp.uk.debian.org/
|(|  Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34,   21075 Hamburg,    GERMANY

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: