Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> writes: > It seems far harder to do so for a service that provides no > daemonization support at all, expects socket or D-Bus activation, > integrates with containerization, or otherwise makes use of the > variety of mechanisms that make it far easier to write more capable > and secure services these days. If that is the case, shouldn't the package "Depends:" on systemd? Benda