Re: alias type forwarders WAS: SPAM
On 14603 March 1977, Geert Stappers wrote:
>> The debian lists work. Alioth currently wouldn't, I think, but software
>> could be upgraded.
>> It has a different problem which is way worse: It breaks usual alias
>> type forwarders, which are used *a lot* within Debian.
> What are the ideas about changing those aliases into something
> that wouldn't break by SPF, DKIM and such?
I'm not a member of DSA, and as they run the mail servers, its their
call. From what I know of their opinions[1], not likely to happen.
[1] personal, I don't think the team has formed a team one yet. Again,
I'm not a member of it.
--
bye, Joerg
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: SPAM
- From: Christopher Clements <bcnjr5@gmail.com>
- Re: SPAM
- From: The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Christopher Clements <bcnjr5@gmail.com>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Christopher Clements <bcnjr5@gmail.com>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Vincent Danjean <vdanjean.ml@free.fr>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
- alias type forwarders WAS: SPAM
- From: Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl>