On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Francesco Poli wrote: > Hello, > I am a Debian contributor (and Alioth user). > > First off, I think that [replacing] Alioth with something more > maintainable is a good thing to do and I am grateful to the people who > are working hard to make this happen. > > [replacing]: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/09/msg00004.html> > > I read through the [minutes] of the Alioth sprint and I learned that > GitLab has been chosen as the project-hosting-system to use (rather > than Pagure, which was initially suggested). Well, let's hope that > things go smoothly, despite the "open core" strategy followed by the > company behind GitLab (a strategy that I dislike)... > > [minutes]: <https://gobby.debian.org/export/Sprints/AliothSuccessors2017/Minutes> > > > In the [minutes], I read: > > [...] > | * Decision: We are going with GitLab and we are using upstreams packages. In fact thats not the case anymore. We are using the source, managed as a non-root user on a dsa managed machine. Alex
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature