Re: e2fsprogs as Essential: yes?
On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 06:27 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 11:03:18AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > This is a fair point, but I think the perfect is the enemy of the good.
> > I agree that moving badblocks, lsattr and chattr to another package or
> > inside src:util-linux is something worth to consider. Yet, it feels like
> > a secondary thought to me. It is not something I will drive.
> It seems far easier to move them before explicitly dependencies are added,
> rather than after, no?
Perhaps `Provides: ` would be an appropriate stop-gap?