Re: 132 packages with several sources for stretch in the archive… (Re: Bug#860608: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#860608: golang: FTBFS: Go version is "go1.6.1", ignoring -next /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/api/next.txt)
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Cc: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>, 860608@bugs.debian.org, Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg@debian.org>, Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: 132 packages with several sources for stretch in the archive… (Re: Bug#860608: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#860608: golang: FTBFS: Go version is "go1.6.1", ignoring -next /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/api/next.txt)
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 15:52:56 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20170501135256.bvndcjew2rh64u5c@betterave.cristau.org>
- In-reply-to: <20170421112930.GA26356@layer-acht.org>
- References: <20170419062130.qhhk3dgdumkrdvd2@xanadu.blop.info> <CANnVG6kr70UmV-mYgt0vLvm5PwMg8Sm59evObuFD-fC3uj3rJw@mail.gmail.com> <20170419085520.wh4kh4hb5s5d762b@xanadu.blop.info> <CAJ8wqtejrtkCfO-a69OT5OuhbAjs=TQpBuOf+531fQJWiyVdrA@mail.gmail.com> <CANnVG6nE4oK2X+iQ1hwz_Ez=DHn+3H9OgazkY00aoeYA87ww5Q@mail.gmail.com> <a2007d58-fddb-aeb1-43bc-d87ad69711b9@thykier.net> <CANnVG6mJBjV-7NheH8B_UY8qUAvB=SaC8G925Vmv9vYJc0BuNA@mail.gmail.com> <6d4da69d-8ca6-febf-9d52-a48f2798753f@thykier.net> <20170421110020.j4aobds3ylc5nuib@xanadu.blop.info> <20170421112930.GA26356@layer-acht.org>
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:29:30 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:00:20PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > FYI, that's the number of additional copies of source packages in
> > stretch, per source package:
> >
> > udd=> select source, count(*) from sources where release='stretch' and
> > component='main' and extra_source_only group by source order by count
> > desc;
> [...]
> > (132 rows)
>
> that's quite astounding (to me) and IMHO also quite bad… can we do something
> to fix this for Buster at least?
>
It's actually quite good, for those that aren't false positive, that
we're tracking them.
Cheers,
Julien
Reply to: