On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:44:40PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > I don't think this number is bad per-se (assuming this extra_source_only > just meant it has "Build-Using"). The bad thing in my opinion is when > multiple version are kept around for a long time. I consider the life time of stretch to be long, you don't? Are security updates supposed to be build using the most current source package in stretch or the one specified in "Build-Using"? -- cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature