On 29/03/17 19:37, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:49:48 +0200 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > > [...] >> I think that any package that is essential for the base OS >> (aka Priority: required) should qualify for the system exception. > > Well, for the record, package libssl1.0.2 is Priority: important, > hence, even with this criterion, it would not qualify... > > Right. But the policy itself still makes a lot of sense (IMHO), and it can be useful for more libraries other than OpenSSL. Hopefully OpenSSL will re-license soon to Apache 2.0. Then it may [1] be "only" incompatible with GPLv2-only software. But in the worst case, it will be compatible with GPLv2+ and GPLv3. Regards ------- [1] IANAL https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-dev/2017-March/009178.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature