Re: systemd, ntp, kernel and hwclock
Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> writes:
> On 27/02/17 21:26, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> But ntpd is also known to have a large amount of code written
>> without as much regard for security as one would hope. It seems
>> like an unnecessary risk for most systems.
> Thanks for that security tip, I'm tempted to get rid of some ntpd
> instances now, however a few more questions come to mind before I rush in:
Have a look at openntpd, that's coded with security in mind.
- Carsten
Reply to: