Re: Accepted ncc 2.8-2.1 (source amd64) into unstable
Holger Levsen writes ("Re: Accepted ncc 2.8-2.1 (source amd64) into unstable"):
> (truncated) from email@example.com:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 09:33:44PM +0000, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Source: ncc
> > Version: 2.8-2.1
> > Changes:
> > ncc (2.8-2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> UNRELEASED? how did that even work?
Maintainer used `dput' rather than `dgit push'.
(sorry, I couldn't resist...)
Ian Jackson <firstname.lastname@example.org> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.