Re: Feedback on 3.0 source format problems
On Jan 04 2017, Paul Wise <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> I'm interested in what things people still find so off-putting to the
>> point of not wanting to use the new 3.0 source formats.
> I've been reading this thread and keep being reminded of our
> discussion on #debian-dpkg a while ago.
> I think most of the complaints about Debian source package formats are
> rooted in a design mistake made early on. The debian/ directory. The
> debian/ dir controls the upstream source but is in a subdirectory of
> the upstream source. The directory hierarchy is an inverse of the
> relationship between its parts. The debian/patches/ dir is another
> layering violation on top of that.
That is a point I very much agree with in principle.
But I am not sure if a package structure like
would have any *practical* benefits over the current situation, because
this transformation could be trivially automated in either direction.
Or did you have something else in mind?
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«