[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#849703: ITP: ansible-doc -- Documentation for Ansible

On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 05:38:50PM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> Ohai,
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 01:07:44PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> > "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> writes:
> > > Then why not make an additional binary package from the same
> > > source package? This way ansible and its documentation would
> > > not get out of sync.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, we don't build ansible off of the git repository, but
> > rather from the released tarballs.  (The version in upstream's git
> > requires much more extensive dfsg cleanup, and would until recently have
> > required the bundling of multiple upstream repositories together.)
> Actually, I think building from a release tarball is a good thing. This
> ensures that every distro has the same Ansible.
> > It's been a while since we made the decision not to pull from upstream's
> > git; Toni, I'd be happy to work with you on seeing if it's doable now.
> How about we talk to upstream to actually include the docs in the tarballs?
> That should not be that hard.
> Then we can build and ship them and everyone wins?

Let's continue here:

Reply to: