Hi Daniel, On 19-12-16 09:30, Daniel Pocock wrote: > - For those JavaScript libs that have complicated build systems that are > not (yet) supported on Debian, is it reasonable for a package like > homer-ui to simply include the intermediate product of the build, just > before it is minified, into the Debian source package? This may not be > the "preferred form of modification", but it is not difficult to make > modifications to it. The ftp-masters have been very clear on this¹. > - The FTP masters have also expressed concern about the standalone > packaging of very small[3] JavaScript dependencies. Is that still the > same for stretch and beyond? And have accepted that having these small packages is the price that has to be paid for their firm statement. Paul ¹ https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2016/10/msg00066.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature