Re: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#843773: Bug#843773: misleading timestamps in binnmus
- To: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>, 843773@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#843773: Bug#843773: misleading timestamps in binnmus
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:24:16 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20161201152416.iqghvanajlmwi43s@grep.be>
- In-reply-to: <147914345749.3755.11946660980292313514@localhost>
- References: <1478768421.3628.23.camel@43-1.org> <b6f93afb-4ead-983b-e8fa-6aa6940ebdd2@debian.org> <147877558815.3099.12687864797140636215@localhost> <20161110121816.GA10218@layer-acht.org> <8b47a583-45ad-ecc5-0a41-80a9bc337f9e@debian.org> <147893548818.3755.2446661748926874577@localhost> <22569.49554.511742.566777@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <147913430467.3755.13674470140967714268@localhost> <22569.59251.364474.474389@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <147914345749.3755.11946660980292313514@localhost>
Hi,
(Sorry for piping in so late to the party here)
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> But maybe to talk about this option: what would speak against changing the
> "nmu" command of wanna-build to also add an option that allows setting a
> timestamp, or even let wanna-build generate that timestamp itself (from the
> time it processes the "nmu" command) and then pass it to sbuild via a
> not-yet-existing --binNMU-timestamp option?
Wanna-build has a "State-Change" date:
wouter@wuiet:~$ wanna-build -A powerpc --info nbd
nbd:
Package : nbd
Version : 1:3.14-4
Builder : buildd_powerpc-porpora
State : Installed
Section : admin
Priority : source
Installed-Version : 1:3.14-4
Previous-State : Uploaded
State-Change : 2016-11-21 23:13:18.744533
Build-time : 9255
CalculatedPri : 50
component : main
Distribution : sid
Notes : out-of-date
Old-Failed : -------------------- 1:2.9.23-1 --------------------
fails test suite
State-Days : 9
State-Time : 835808
Success-build-time : 366
Why not use that?
--
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
-- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12
Reply to: