Re: -flto to become more of a routine - any change in opinion since 2011?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: -flto to become more of a routine - any change in opinion since 2011?
From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:27:20 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20160329202720.GA4262@jwilk.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] f261639f-7992-35ed-59f0-a4550dc8d0c7@gmx.de>
References: <[🔎] f261639f-7992-35ed-59f0-a4550dc8d0c7@gmx.de>

* Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de>, 2016-03-29, 16:27:

I admit to be a fan of link time optimisation and would like to seethis challenge promoted towards more of a routine challenge toestablish for our packages.

gcc-5 manpage says: "Link-time optimization does not work well withgeneration of debugging information. Combining -flto with -g iscurrently experimental and expected to produce unexpected results."


Um... Automatic debug packages or LTO, choose one?

--
Jakub Wilk

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -flto to become more of a routine - any change in opinion since 2011?
  - From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>

References:
- -flto to become more of a routine - any change in opinion since 2011?
  - From: Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: Re: -flto to become more of a routine - any change in opinion since 2011?
Next by Date: Re: -flto to become more of a routine - any change in opinion since 2011?
Previous by thread: Re: -flto to become more of a routine - any change in opinion since 2011?
Next by thread: Re: -flto to become more of a routine - any change in opinion since 2011?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread