Re: a poll for Dgit workflows
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:32:59PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Adam Borowski writes ("Re: a poll for Dgit workflows"):
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:19:01AM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote:
> > > Ah yes, source format 1.0 fits better here. Thanks for the pointer and
> > > comments (Manoj, too).
> >
> > Please don't use source format 1.0, it sucks. Instead, you can:
> > echo single-debian-patch >debian/source/options
> > which gives you all upsides of 3.0 without the big downside, aka quilt.
>
> Please don't use source format `3.0 (quilt)', it sucks.
Could you tell us what other downsides it has, besides quilt?
All other differences I'm aware of are upsides: .xz, multiple tarballs
or ambivalent: purging upstream debian/
--
A tit a day keeps the vet away.
Reply to: