Re: How to deal with "assets" packages shadowing real upstream
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 02:14:10PM +0000, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:59:29PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I personally feel it is a bug to not track the true upstream of a
> > project, but that seems not part of our Policy. Should I respect fellow
> > package maintainers prioritizing convenience over elegance, or insist
> > that we should strive towards perfection?
>
> The former. "Perfection is the enemy of good" (or "shipped")
No, both. We should respect each other's choices in what we do and don't work
on, but if something is wrong it deserves a bug report. Bug reports aren't
commands to go fix things; they are helpful notifications that something is in
need of fixing.
Thanks,
Bas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJW3xk6AAoJEJzRfVgHwHE6khYP/3oXfN2CmcsPpxbeeuZDCrgq
Ycj4JBfzTxOIYrWFBSxbFCOoMlcSqmuhRrc4Tim9GYn1GBl7ljC1so2BfVSGs2Ei
Cg5nREyO8xz5pZ+LZb2+6r94Nf/8PUpFGyYbdbRkyK1rCtiAeSMkGQh1vb6NRdn/
Q8HQ4wzhewMV1+qoEuwLbwuv3KngsGXsSDrETG9UxgOkMlK9EowvZJ5WRV08jJ5w
LROQ9rW0OXtK6Ql+uQgGoS41gTpEmyfhjh3P+CS1+wgvKUzzkP1t3/h/fLNgEREQ
+9wzDd1ggvoCtKbOw77FErY34V/uOEDyrMPlAQI0kRW1dOTeCMMXwy2iEy4oloE6
yHIyhUCSQhCDJoQi6BLeLY76GhIuK9wQG+ZOQyBsiga+0u7gB0h2jQKyGfxu5jCL
zQQLnkY/u6m+/wOEk3ugxNmBQNMJdYkq0me7SW1Tg5zk/jR0KcCUywOQLTnZ+lFO
6h6+KlBFHkmpawZkYcF85V7WodUVuIY/5oowtiz3Vh9zcFlf7QKso0QoqQ2vIVGD
5ENMH1zeMtiBmXcmfz5YJDyU1l/eY/2DaH+9ouJlk6xiYNw+CHWZIikQzO16tITr
3BD4mQUc7t+v71cb+I1NM/WTn7SCAANu4LBnsIHA5Sl1qE0IWA//eOzo7BuiOr0/
eftUsMzjpr95Ix0lOW01
=mpkU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: