On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:24:49 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Should we just disable the general pseudo-package? Is it serving a > > sufficient useful purpose to warrant the constant (if somewhat slow) > > stream of misdirected bug reports? > I personally don't have a problem with disabling it or turning it into > an auto responder which tells the submitter to communicate with > debian-user or another mailing list to figure out the appropriate > package and/or pseudopackage. Sorry if this has been brought up already. Another option would be to change the mapping of package:general from debian-devel@ldo to debian-user@ldo. I guess this has a similar effect (getting help in triaging the problem) without the unpleasant side effect of an auto-responder or a message+exit in reportbug. Anyway, I'd be very happy to see a change here; the "general" bugs on -devel lead to nothing except frustration on all sides in my experience. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - https://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Little Walter: Blues With A Feeling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature