Re: liblemon_1.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED [and 2 more messages]
On 09/08/16 19:40, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Do we _usually_ have files in .debs which are *derived from* (not just
> generated by) files from other packages, whose authorship is not
> represented in the resulting .deb ?
> (I think it is fair to disregard things like libgcc, whose authors
> have explicitly disclaimed the requirement to notify recipients of
> executables about the inclusion of libgcc.)
Any package calling inline or #defined functions from a different package?