Re: EVP_dss1 replacement?
On 06/29/2016 10:29 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:15:39AM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> So is it correct to simply replace EVP_dss1() with EVP_sha1() in the
>> above code and it will still produce DSA signatures? Or do I have to do
>> something else to achieve the same results?
> I'm not sure why they were removed at this time and not just
> replaced by a #define.
> Using EVP_sha1() is the correct replacement for EVP_dss1(),
> as the manpage says.
Great, many thanks!