Re: Bug#783876: Seriously, these binaries should be stripped by default
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:31:46PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:40:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
>>The unstripped binaries should be installed by default on porter boxes and
>>buildds. Yes, this is a trade-off between (largely my) developer time, the
>>ability for Debian developers to produce complete bug reports, and an
>>increase on machine/bandwidth resources. If I have the choice to select
>>between human and other resources, I'll try to keep the time I have to spend
>>on reproducing things rather small.
>
>With separate -unstripped (or whatever) packages, they could be
>installed by admin choice in those situations.
Following up a bit more - I understand what you've done here, and I
understand what you're trying to achieve here. Would you accept
patches to add -unstripped versions to the packaging if they were
offered?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
"Because heaters aren't purple!" -- Catherine Pitt
Reply to: