[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /usr/bin/openssl failed on sso.debian.org



Quoting Enrico Zini (2016-04-10 10:44:02)
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 11:25:34PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> I have seen no sign that Chrome or Firefox developers have much 
>>> interest in supporting WebID either, and given how I've seen one of 
>>> the WebID people argue their case[1] with the Chrome and Firefox 
>>> developers, the little interest they might have had to start with is 
>>> probably gone by now :/
>>
>> You can consider both WebID itself and the social skills of its 
>> defenders bad, yet still benefit from following their work.
>
> What is have seen of their work is that it relies on the same features 
> that we use on sso.debian.org, and when those will go away, both 
> sso.debian.org and webid will stop working.

Ah, so you are aware of their work already.  Good.


> If WebID has a workable plan for what to do after <keygen> disappears, 
> I haven't seen it. If you have, please send me precise details[1]: I 
> haven't seen any in https://www.w3.org/mid/20150730174424.GA7779@c

I am unaware of them being magicians.  Some of them have put together 
Javascript for execution in the browser.  I guess you already know about 
(and dislike) that workaround.


> [1] patches would be even better, because sso.debian.org is a service 
> that I DO NOT WANT TO MAINTAIN, and I'm just stuck with it because I 
> seem to be the person in Debian that needs an authentication system 
> the most (for nm.debian.org and contributors.debian.org).

I am aware.  Pointing you at fellow developers is as far as my skills 
reach in this area, unfortunately.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: