Re: debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]
Hi
On 6 de marzo de 2016 13:13:45 GMT+01:00, Holger Wansing <linux@wansing-online.de> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Holger Wansing <linux@wansing-online.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Holger Wansing <linux@wansing-online.de> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote:
>> > > Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> (2016-02-06):
>> > > > Hello,
>> > > >
>> > > > a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +0000, wrote:
>> > > > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It
>says in
>> > > > > abstract that the documentation is for debian strech and the
>url says
>> > > > > about stable release.
>> > > >
>> > > > It's worse than that: it seems it's really the current Stretch
>> > > > installation guide which ended up on the website in stable/, I
>don't
>> > > > know why. Www people, any idea?
>> > >
>> > > Because
>http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide
>> > >
>> > > It would be nice if it could put stuff targetting s(-p-u) under
>stable, and
>> > > stuff targetting unstable under testing, but I didn't reach this
>point of my
>> > > todo list yet.
>> >
>> > For the time being:
>> >
>> > Looking at
>> >
>http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/commit/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide?id=c8148aba41b484964cb7a627c5c954a19f056d38
>> > it seems, we have the same situation again now:
>> >
>> > The latest upload of installation-guide was for Stretch (Changelog
>does
>> > not mention that explicitly, but there are several changings
>effecting
>> > Stretch), so that script has to be adapted around that:
>> >
>> > all occurences of 'jessie' have to be changed into 'stretch' and
>> > all 'wheezy' be changed into 'jessie'.
>> >
>> >
>> > Am I correct?
>> > If yes, could someone commit that, please !!!
>>
>> I have tried to apply this, but I'm lacking proper permissions.
>>
>> Anyone?
>
>I have asked for membership in the relevant alioth project "debwww"
>~ 10 days ago, but got no answer yet :-((
>
>What can be done about this?
>
>Somebody here, who minds doing the above changing?
>(Noone on debian-www objected against this for weeks, so I assume
>change
>this is the right thing to do, to get the problem solved.)
>
>
>Holger
I'm in debwww since some days ago and this is one of the things I wanted to look at, but couldn't put time yet.
I hope I can have a look at it in the following days.
Thanks Holger, and sorry for the delay!
Best regards
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Reply to: