Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now
Bas Wijnen <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:57:43PM +0100, gaffa wrote:
> > It's an MIT license:
> That's a fine license as far as the DFSG is concerned, but as long as
> they don't provide source, it's still not free software.
Indeed, as far as the DFSG is concerned, it needs to be applied to
*specific works* with their license conditions, not license texts in
This case is a clear demonstration of why asking “does this license make
the work DFSG-free?” is no use absent the context of a specific work.
\ “Every sentence I utter must be understood not as an |
`\ affirmation, but as a question.” —Niels Bohr |