On Jan 03, Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org> wrote: > > "I have always done this in a different way" is not a valid use case, > > sorry. > "Compatibility" is a very valid use case. Debian is famous for backwards > compatibility and trouble-free upgrades. Requiring to use an initramfs in some configurations does not break compatibility nor causes significant troubles on upgrades. > However, this also means that systemd can never fully replace sysvinit, > except on desktops, laptops and servers that follow a standard layout. I see no reason why this would be true. Anyway, if you think that the merged /usr scheme is about systemd then you are automatically disqualified from taking part in this discussion because you are not understanding the basic underlying issues. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature