On 04/01/16 00:25, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jan 03, Eric Valette <eric.valette@free.fr> wrote: > >> The debian installer should first loudly warn that having a separated / and >> /usr may break things in the future but not forbid it. With that in place, > This is not true: you just need to use an initramfs. > "I have always done this in a different way" is not a valid use case, > sorry. Really, just because the use case isn't one you understand doesn't mean it should be entirely ignored. Sure there are corner cases that will always be fragile, but that's not the issue here. The issue at hand is the provision of tooling that fundamentally violates the FHS by changing the location of where binaries and libraries are located, and only because of sloppy workmanship that has allowed packages in that will break systems if we don't adopt these massive changes. > > And again, this is not related to supporting a merged /usr scheme. > That doesn't make sense given the subject you started this whole thread with... -- Daniel Reurich Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd. 021 797 722
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature