Re: DAK Commands for Bikesheds
On 09/21/2015 06:12 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 20 Sep 2015, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>>> (It seems they are implicitly considered a master when updating the
>>> bikeshed's ACLs) I would have thought "Owner:" would make more sense
>>> than "Master:" fwiw.
>>
>> Then you end up having multiple owners. Master IMO shows better what the
>> intended value of it is - the ones with access to change around its
>> settings. (Got to that from the MASTER role in irc.debian.orgs chanserv).
>
> FWIW, I also find Owner clearer than Master. Or Admin. But master is
> rather unusual.
>
>> Your -pull-from is basically my -add, just with an added suite. My way
>> of thinking is coming from a way more limited usage, so I adjusted add
>> to optionally take Suite as parameter, now one can select from where the
>> package comes.
>
> BTW bikeshed-add and bikeshed-rm should be named "bikeshed-add-package"
> and "bikeshed-rm-package" otherwise they end up at the same level
> than "bikeshed-modify" and you would expect the current commands to
> add/remove a bikeshed instead of actually adding/removing a package
> in it.
>
> Cheers,
In which case maybe we want bikeshed-pkg-{add,rm} (and probably more
later, like maybe update or sync (from another bikeshed / suite)?).
Just my 2 cents...
Thomas
Reply to: