On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 15:02 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > Do we now require DKMS, which requires a fully-blown build system on > the target box? Wouldn't it be much better to be able to build a > virtualbox-modules-$KERNELFLAVOUR.deb? What was so bad with > module-assistant? I think it is still there. But given the features of dkms, nobody must be missing it. -- Given the large number of mailing lists I follow, I request you to CC me in replies for quicker response
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part