Re: system upgrade by systemd
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: system upgrade by systemd
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 04:43:02 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20150901024302.GA14503@bongo.bofh.it>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <CANBHLUhAUHN42OMw+TnRz5xG_A-n_Ny1gSW7a126yC8piHUOhQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <55DD7C74.3000300@sunrise.ch> <CAKNHny-f56cx8_y15nuF0UMnbssJnLVUDavi1z6iQvt-tg4SNQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150826122702.GB4121@feivel.credativ.lan> <20150826132231.GA21821@0d.be> <55DE825D.6030502@debian.org> <1440880933.11756.28.camel@debian.org> <E1ZVyMX-00017x-7V@swivel.zugschlus.de> <20150830092701.GB3679@raptor.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> <20150831094330.GB3040@feivel.credativ.lan> <CANBHLUhAUHN42OMw+TnRz5xG_A-n_Ny1gSW7a126yC8piHUOhQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Aug 31, Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@debian.org> wrote:
> Ideally the update generators, targets and units should be split into
> a separate package and not installed by default. Since those are
> really unexpected on Debian.
No, because the system update infrastructure stays idle until some other
package tells it to do something and does not express policies by
itself.
If you do not like the policy being discussed here then you should work
with the maintainer of the package that requests such updates.
--
ciao,
Marco
Attachment:
pgpkDXJXvIaEX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: