❦ 29 juillet 2015 13:48 +0100, Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> : >> > If you are an NMUer or a downstream using dgit, you should usually >> > make plain git commits (with no changes to the patch stack). dgit >> > will generate a separate patch for each of your commits. You should >> > leave rebasing/squashing/refreshing to the maintainer. This rule is >> > necessary because if two developers both rebase/squash/refresh in >> > parallel, it is difficult to merge their work. >> >> OK, so for a regular maintainer using quilt and git-buildpackage, the >> only change to integrate dgit into the workflow is to replace `gbp >> buildpackage && dput` with `dgit git-build && dgit push`? > > Maybe. I'm afraid I don't know for sure how gbp works so it may be > that the workflow is more complicated. > > I got the impression that gbp normally works with a patches-unapplied > tree. Is that correct ? If so then an additional gbp step may be > needed, to convert the tree to patches-applied. There is a patch management system but I think that most people (at least me) are just using gbp with plain/normal quilt. -- ROMEO: Courage, man; the hurt cannot be much. MERCUTIO: No, 'tis not so deep as a well, nor so wide as a church-door; but 'tis enough, 'twill serve.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature