[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should .a library contains non-reallocatable code?



On 2015-02-24 11:01, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> I agree with this; are there any cases where only a static library _is_
> provided, and if so why? why not provide a .so?

One use case that was described to me was about libraries with APIs that
were not yet considered stable enough to be (properly) supported as a
shared lib.

Regards,
Christian


Reply to: