Re: length of a package extended description

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: length of a package extended description
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 16:47:47 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20150109154747.GA18101@bongo.bofh.it>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20150109135625.GA23529@xvii.vinc17.org>
References: <[🔎] 20150109135625.GA23529@xvii.vinc17.org>

On Jan 09, Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> wrote:

> Shouldn't the length be limited by the Debian policy?
Shouldn't the length be limited by common sense?
In this case I think that listing the packages without the description 
of each one would be enough...

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: pgpWhakahQPqV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: length of a package extended description
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

References:
- length of a package extended description
  - From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>

Prev by Date: length of a package extended description
Next by Date: Re: length of a package extended description
Previous by thread: length of a package extended description
Next by thread: Re: length of a package extended description
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread