Re: PCRE package naming
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 03:51:26PM +0000, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> No, the -dev packages will need to be co-installable, too. I expect
> we'll need to ship PCRE (including its -dev package) for quite some time.
>
> ...so I'm still not sure what to call PCRE2 :-/
Sorry if I'm being thick, but libpcre2-dev doesn't clash with libpcre3-dev,
and the descriptions (short and long) can clarify what they actually are.
Is there anything preventing a rename of libpcre2-dev to libpcre-dev, first?
Reply to: