[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On September 13, 2015 9:33:52 PM GMT-03:00, Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> wrote:
>On Wednesday, September 09 2015, I wrote:
>> On Monday, August 24 2015, I wrote:
>>> On Friday, August 14 2015, Andres Salomon wrote:
>>>>> Your work was done back in June, so if you prefer I can provide
>>>>> patches against your branch to implement/fix the issues I have
>>>>> working on. It won't really matter much, I think: in the end,
>>>>> have to use the "official" repository anyway and patch it.
>>>> That would be highly preferred, simply for reviewing purposes.  I'm
>>>> also happy to rewrite parts of my history to, for example, not
>>>> the -O--buildsystem stuff.  But the existing git history is useful,
>>>> I'd rather work from that.
>>> OK, I've done it:
>>>   <http://git.sergiodj.net/?p=debian/midori.git;a=summary>
>>> It's the same link, but the repository is a new one, based on the
>>> official repository.
>> Just another update.
>> I've re-created the repository above (the previous version contained
>> some mistakes, and I thought it made sense to restart from scratch).
>> Now, you can find the latest version of Midori (0.5.11, released a
>> days ago) along with all the other changes that I had already made.
>> Still builds successfully, and I'm using this latest version without
>> problems.  IOW, everything is ready to be used in Debian, and I'm
>> happy with the current state of the repository.
>One (last?) update.
>I have upgrade/recreated the repository one more time now.  Thadeu
>Cascardo pointed me to two lintian warnings that I had not seen before
>(they're fixed now), and I've cherry-picked Andreas's commits (those
>that import the NMU-0.2 and merge it to master), so now I think
>everything is *really* covered.  Oh, and I've searched the BTS and
>two bugs that requested a new version to be packaged, so I'm closing
>them in the changelog.  I intend to do a full bug triage once the
>package is back to life.
>Just for the record, I've kept *all* history from the previous git
>branches, so absolutely nothing is deleted nor lost.
>In other words, the package is ready to be re-uploaded.

Thanks, Sergio.

I find the repo and package in a good state for an upload. I will do it tomorrow night, if there are no further strong objections.

Thanks Andres for his work as well, and all the others for their past contributions.

Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Reply to: