Re: GCC 5 in stretch: what next?
On 06/09/15 17:30, Simon Richter wrote:
> I have a package (librevisa) with a C API that uses C++ internally. Can
> I ignore the transition completely because nothing breaks?
If it is purely internal, then yes this is fine, and you do not need a
rename/transition. Several libraries are in that situation.
According to <https://titanpad.com/UtA5km2wW6>, someone (I think I dimly
remember it being me) looked at librevisa and assessed it as not needing
a transition on that basis.