Re: Improving your archive and package system for small package
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Jérémy Lal <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> 2015-09-03 13:36 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIES <email@example.com>:
>> In order to improve node situation we need to improve the small
>> packages problems.
>> What are the main bottlenet ? What could be done to improve the situation
>> The node small package does not change often so it could be a win to
>> your archive size.
>> Moreover if we could solve this problem we could think about small
>> perl package or even tex package.
>> PS: no flame war please. I am juste trying to package stuff for grunt
>> and I have a lot of package in the kB range.
> Hi Bastien,
> please read
> and what follows.
> At this point anyone can help by writing some python code...
I was thinking generally, perl latex python have a lot of small
package. Each language could not come with its own solution. Maybe
creating a tool agregating small debian package in a big one. But