On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 11:24:12PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > Everything boils down to an ITP bug? In the case of a dispite, well, yeah, that's clearly why they exist. > I think this clearly shows my intent to package it: Sure, *your* intent, but that's not you getting the global mutex. If I want to package something, I'll search for a RFP or ITP, and use that. If I don't see anything, I put it in NEW. > https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/wip/ ... I surely don't look at every DD's people.d.o for a .dsc When two threads do work without both checking the mutex, you end up with a race condition when both try to write data back out. Live and learn. This is literally why ITPs exist. Frankly, you're assuming malice. That's out of line, Why not be friendly and create something positive out of this. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature