[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: Adding support for LZIP to dpkg, using that instead of xz, archive wide

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:11:15PM +0200, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> I guess we are thinking about different use cases here: verifying a package
> that can be easily downloaded again in case of corruption, vs decompressing
> the only copy of an irreplaceable file.

> BTW, telling a user that the only surviving copy of his important data is
> corrupt just because cp screwed it up and appended some garbage data at the
> end of the file is as unfriendly as it can be.
How is this relevant to the use case  we are discussing, again?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: