On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:11:15PM +0200, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote: > I guess we are thinking about different use cases here: verifying a package > that can be easily downloaded again in case of corruption, vs decompressing > the only copy of an irreplaceable file. Indeed. > BTW, telling a user that the only surviving copy of his important data is > corrupt just because cp screwed it up and appended some garbage data at the > end of the file is as unfriendly as it can be. How is this relevant to the use case we are discussing, again? -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature