Re: Proposal: enable stateless persistant network interface names
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:53:53AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I believe that firmware-based device names work well enough in practice
> since RHEL 7 uses them by default: I tend to trust a market-based
> approach to maintenability more than anecdote from a very selected
> population like the debian-devel@ subscribers.
RHEL itself targets only a "very selected population" - corporate
server setups with usually very uniform datacenter-grade
hardware. Debian has an a lot more diverse userbase and caters
for many users outside the corporate server world, so what might
be a proper solution for RHEL does not have to be a proper
solution for Debian.
Regards,
Karsten
--
Gem. Par. 28 Abs. 4 Bundesdatenschutzgesetz widerspreche ich der Nutzung
sowie der Weitergabe meiner personenbezogenen Daten für Zwecke der
Werbung sowie der Markt- oder Meinungsforschung.
Reply to: