Re: Debian Archive architecture removals
- To: Richard Braun <rbraun@sceen.net>
- Cc: Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab@web.de>, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org, Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Debian Archive architecture removals
- From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 15:00:15 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20150505130015.GK6832@type.labri.fr>
- Mail-followup-to: Richard Braun <rbraun@sceen.net>, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab@web.de>, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org, Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20150505122710.GA31058@dalaran.sceen.net>
- References: <87zj63oj1r.fsf@gkar.ganneff.de> <[🔎] 2537504.PQ9xuzfBKf@fluss> <[🔎] 20150505122710.GA31058@dalaran.sceen.net>
Richard Braun, le Tue 05 May 2015 12:27:10 +0000, a écrit :
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:36:57PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > Given that the package coverage of the Hurd continuously increased and
> > that it just released 0.6 of its core components[1] along with releasing
> > Debian GNU/Hurd[2], this strikes me as an odd time to throw the Hurd off
> > ftp-master.
>
> It's irrelevant.
Yes, my point is that it should not be relevant. Being mirrored is
clearly useless. The concern is actually that being on master is
currently more than about just that.
Samuel
Reply to: