[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#782464: general: access violation 7e9bc87f in module gdi32 dill read of address 00aiffo2



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

retitle 782646 [regression] segmentation fault running voaprop.exe
reassign 782646 wine
severity 782646 normal
tags 782646 +upstream +moreinfo
thanks

Hi,

This appears to be a wine bug, so I've reassigned it to the wine
maintainers. I'm fairly sure they have further questions and/or
instructions. If I've made an error in the initial classification,
please speak up.

> * What led up to the situation? updates of system

Since you appear to be running Debian wheezy (7.8), that should never
happen. Have you upgraded to Debian jessie (in that case, your update
seems incomplete), or just run a regular update?

> * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or 
> ineffectived)

> I tried to reinstall program, did not help, mint 17 has same
> problem

This affects multiple distributions, so it is likely to be a general
problem with the software rather than with the packaging ("upstream").

> * What was the outcome of this action?

> voaprop in wine quit working

What software is that?

> * What outcome did you expect instead?

> with update not to make program to stop working in get message
> (access violation 7e9bc87f in module gdi32 dill read of ooaiffo2

> -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.8 APT prefers
> stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500,
> 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686)

> Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale:
> LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh
> linked to /bin/dash

As said, there may be further questions, but if I have guessed wrong
somewhere, please tell us at the address specific for this bug report
(782646@bugs.debian.org). You should receive copies of most of the
conversation about this problem anyway, and the current state of the
discussion can always be found at http://bugs.debian/org/782646 .

   Simon


Reply to: