On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:13:19AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 16, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote: > > > I was really confused that this needed to go to the TC; from what I > > could tell, it had no downside systems using systemd, and it made > > things better on non-systemd systems. What was the downside of making > > the change, and why did it have to go to the TC instead of the > > maintainer simply accepting the patch? > This is what many still (retorically) wonder about: we the systemd > maintainers did not reject that change, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=15;bug=746578 -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature