Re: possible MBF: automatically detecting unused build dependencies

To: Johannes Schauer <j.schauer@email.de>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: possible MBF: automatically detecting unused build dependencies
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 00:36:37 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140708223637.GA14118@roeckx.be>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140707115100.14505.86283@hoothoot>
References: <[🔎] 20140707115100.14505.86283@hoothoot>

On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:51:00PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
>    libtool

==> libtool_2.4.2-1.7.arch-all.unusedbd <==
gfortran=4:4.8.2-4

gfortran Depends on gfortran-4.8, and that is being used.

>    openssl (U)
==> openssl_1.0.1g-4.arch-all.unusedbd <==
m4=1.4.17-4

>From the changelog:
  * Add Build-Dependency on m4, since sparc needs it to generate
    it's assembler files.  (Closes: #334542)


Kurt

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: possible MBF: automatically detecting unused build dependencies
  - From: Johannes Schauer <j.schauer@email.de>

References:
- possible MBF: automatically detecting unused build dependencies
  - From: Johannes Schauer <j.schauer@email.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal to avoid executable naming conflicts (was: Bug#753704: ITP: amap -- Next-generation scanning tool for pentesters)
Next by Date: Re: possible MBF: automatically detecting unused build dependencies
Previous by thread: Re: possible MBF: automatically detecting unused build dependencies
Next by thread: Re: possible MBF: automatically detecting unused build dependencies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread