On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:22:42 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > For the case of pam, I would be interested in seeing the full build log to > understand how in the world this built successfully without libdb. That's > definitely a packaging error on my part, because without libdb, > pam_userdb.so should not build, which in turn *should* be treated as a build > failure. But I guess I'm not accounting for individual modules in the build > output, since in general the greater risk is failing to keep this list in > sync with new upstream modules, rather than misbuilding and losing a module > from the tree. > dh_install --fail-missing would help for the case where new modules are added and need to be accounted for in the packaging. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature