[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#754104: marked as done (general: Repetitive message "hub 1-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on port 3")

Your message dated Mon, 7 Jul 2014 17:16:18 +0200
with message-id <201407071716.19681.holger@layer-acht.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#754104: general: Repetitive message "hub 1-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on port 3"
has caused the Debian Bug report #754104,
regarding general: Repetitive message "hub 1-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on port 3"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
754104: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754104
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: general
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?

It seems that buf occured after last system upgrade (apt-get upgrade)



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.5
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

sounds like faulty hardware, maybe. 

I'm closing this bug, as the BTS is not for user support, as one example for 
that see http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ 


cheers,
	Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
Reply to: