Re: Bug#753704: ITP: amap -- Next-generation scanning tool for pentesters

[Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>]

* Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>, 2014-07-06, 21:04:
> I see some legitimate scenarios for a single package to have something 
> both in $X/bin and $X/sbin, but not really across package boundaries.

These are deliberate:

* safe-rm ships /usr/bin/rm;

* molly-guard ships /usr/sbin/{halt,poweroff,reboot,shutdown}

* elvis-tiny ships /bin/vi (like other vi clones, it also installs an 
alternative for /usr/bin/vi)


Would you call them “legitimate” or not?

--
Jakub Wilk