Re: Bug#735927: general: X *always* crashes when ram is full
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 01/20/2014 02:43 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> It would be interesting to have further data from users who could try
> running with /tmp on the rootfs SSD and on a tmpfs (with or without
> the swap on the SSD).
My swap, /tmp, /boot, /usr, and / are all LVM logical volumes, on a
volume group backed by two identical 256GB SSDs in RAID-1 via mdraid,
and I haven't noticed any issues. All other filesystems (/var, /opt,
/home) are on a separate volume group backed by RAID-5 mechanical
storage.
However, not only does the RAID-1 question introduce another variable
and likely improve performance, these drives were specifically chosen
because they were top performers in their capacity class at the time -
and with SSDs, higher capacity generally performs better anyway. So this
may not be a particularly valuable datapoint.
- --
The Wanderer
Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.
A government exists to serve its citizens, not to control them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=tpWt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: